SMALL ANIMAL ORTHOPEDICS

ELBOW DYSPLASIA

Dr. Daniel D. Lewis, DVM, Diplomate ACVS

Small Animal Advanced Orthopedic Surgery (VEM 5432)

wpe47.jpg (9572 bytes)

Elbow Dysplasia
OCD - Humerus
UAP
FCP
References

 

Ununited Anconeal Process

AC elbows01.jpg (57569 bytes) WP4.jpg (37896 bytes)

Faxitron radiograph of a dog's elbow withan ununited anconeal process

 

Ununited anconeal process occurs primarily in large and giant-breed dogs, most notably German shepherds. The condition is also recognized with some frequency in chondrodystrophic breeds such as Bassett hounds and Bulldogs, as a result of retarded ulnar growth resulting in elbow incongruency. Male dogs are affected approximately twice as frequently as female dogs. The condition is bilateral in 11-30% of affected dogs.

Diagnosis of ununited anconeal process is confirmed by a flexed lateral radiograph of the elbow. In breeds that are predisposed to ununited anconeal process, the anconeal process develops as a distinct center of ossification separate from the ulna. In German shepherd dogs, the anconeal process begins to mineralize at approximately 12 weeks of age and fuses with the ulna at 16 to 24 weeks of age. A definitive diagnosis of ununited anconeal process thus should not be made before 24 weeks of age.

 

WP5a.jpg (38801 bytes)
Several radiographs (above) and histologic sections (below) demonstrating the development of the anconeal process. A. At 10  weeks the anconeal process is completely composed of cartilage. B. The anconeal process is beginning to mineralize at 12 weeks.  C. At 16 weeks the process is nearly completely mineralized, but still separated from the rest of the ulna. D. At 20   weeks the anconealy process is fused with the ulna.
WP6a.jpg (128571 bytes)

 

WP7a.jpg (111045 bytes) WP7b.jpg (33387 bytes)
Gross specimen and faxitron radiograph of a dog's elbow with and ununited anconeal process. Note the proximal (abnormal) displacement of the radial head.

 

Congruency of the elbow must be assessed as many dogs (chondrodystrophic and non-chondrodystrophic) with ununited anconeal process have proximal radiohumeral subluxation.

Secondary degenerative changes of the elbow may be present. Dogs with ununited anconeal process typically develop an intermittent, subtle to severe lameness of gradual onset between five and nine months of age. It should be noted, however, that ununited anconeal process can be a serendipitous radiographic finding in mature and middle-aged dogs with no prior history of forelimb lameness or can be a cause of acute forelimb lameness in mature or middled-aged dogs which may not have had any previous history of lameness.

Excision of the ununited anconeal process is still the most widely accepted treatment for this condition. If the anconeal process is to be excised, it is removed via a caudolateral approach to the elbow.

 

AC elbows03.jpg (55314 bytes) AC elbows04.jpg (65714 bytes)

 

The anconeal process is generally not freely moveable because of numerous fibrous adhesions. These adhesions must be broken down with a periosteal elevator to remove the anconeal process.

 

WP9.jpg (288062 bytes) WP10.jpg (184690 bytes)
WP11.jpg (77242 bytes)

 

Intra operative photography of a caudo-lateral arthrotomy of the elbow and ununited anconeal process removal.
Following surgery the limb is placed in a soft padded bandage for several days to limit swelling. Exercise is restricted for 21 days; however, passive flexion and extension of the elbow should be performed during this time.  

Although the prognosis for working and athletic dogs with ununited anconeal process is guarded, many dogs obtain surprising good limb function following process excision. A recent retrospective study evaluated the long-term (mean follow-up 65 months following surgery) clinical results in six dogs which had ununited anconeal processes (one bilateral) excised between five and 12 months of age.

Although degenerative joint disease progressed and range of motion was decreased in all affected elbows, limb use was considered good to excellent in six of the seven operated limbs. Others have reported similar results, and we have had dogs with ununited anconeal process return to hunting, obedience and field trial work after process excision. Some lameness after vigorous exercise, however, should be expected and medical management of these dog’s arthritis may be necessary at some point in time.

 

AC elbows02.jpg (50329 bytes) Stabilization of the ununited anconeal process utilizing lag screw fixation have been suggested, but this procedure has met with technical difficulties and complications and long-term results establishing the efficacy of lag screw fixation are lacking. One report described radiographic union of six of 10 ununited anconeal processes stabilized by lag screw fixation.  Detail information describing limb function in these dogs, unfortunately, was not available.
Recent reports describe union of the ununited anconeal process with the olecranon following proximal diaphyseal ulnar osteotomy in young dogs with proximal humeroradial subluxation. The proximal diaphyseal ulnar osteotomy is performed to improve elbow joint congruency, and relieve pressure on the anconeal process. The anconeal process fuses to the ulna in a slightly abnormal position. WP13.jpg (56566 bytes)

Radiograph of a dog that has undergone stabilization of an ununited anconeal process.

 

AC elbows05.jpg (56264 bytes)

Proximal ulnar diaphyseal osteotomy can be performed to treat young dogs with an ununited anconeal process and elbow incongruity.

 

155197 UAP Posta.jpg (6834 bytes) 155197 UAP Prea.jpg (8740 bytes)
155197 UAP 3wka.jpg (7995 bytes) 155197 UAP 6wka.jpg (6802 bytes)
Radiographs of a proximal diaphyseal ulnar osteotomy used to  sucessfully treat a dog with an ununited anconeal process. Pre operative (A), Immediate post op (B), 3 weeks (C) and 6 weeks (D) post op.

 

The long-term functional results associated with proximal diaphyseal ulnar osteotomy appear to be superior in comparison to process excision. The value of performing osteotomies to improve joint congruency at the time of anconeal process excision in dogs with proximal humeroradial subluxation has not been established. Empirically it would seem advantageous to restore normal joint congruency, particular in dogs with marked subluxation; however, it is not known whether improving joint congruency results in improved limb function any more than fragment excision alone.
 

Elbow Dysplasia ] OCD - Humerus ] [ UAP ] FCP ] References ]

This page was last updated on 10/07/99